|
NEWSLETTER VOLUME 6 - ISSUE 2
© DR DEBORAH BAKER-RACINE 2006
In
this issue:
1)CRIMES
AT THE CDC
2)
The United States Congress and the FDA
CRIMES AT THE CDC
Mark Sircus
Ac., OMD
Director International Medical Veritas Association
A
new study published today (3/1/06)
shows that the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDs) in children
has decreased following removal of thimerosal, a preservative containing
the neurotoxin mercury, from American childhood vaccines. The study,
published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, a
peer reviewed journal, by Dr. Mark Geier and David Geier examined
two independent databases maintained by the government - one national
and one state. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)
database maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and the
Californian Department of Developmental Services (CDDS) database
each showed the same downward trend for the period from 2002 through
2005. According to the study "[t]he results indicate that the
trends in newly diagnosed NDs correspond directly with the expansion
and subsequent contraction of the cumulative mercury dose to which
children were exposed from [thimerosal-containing vaccines] through
the U.S. immunization
schedule." (Find full study at this address:) http://www.a-champ.org/documents/geier%20Early%20Downward%20Trends%20JAPS%203-1-06.pdf
Also
today Robert F. Kennedy Jr. published some devastating evidence
that implicated the CDC in a terrible scandal in regards to the
unnecessary injection of millions of children with thimerosal.
Correspondence newly obtained under the Freedom of Information
Act reveals a medical monstrocity made manifest at the very center
of the medical world. Soon after the CDC in July 1999 recommended
that the nation's vaccine makers eliminate Thimerosal as a preservative, "as
soon as possible," they
themselves (the CDC) secretly discouraged Thimerosal's removal
in effect deliberately exposing millions of infants to continued
mercury poisoning.
According
to Kennedy, in a July 1999 letter, vaccine producer SmithKline
Beecham tells CDC that it is ready to produce non-Thimerosal
DTP (Diptheria/Tetanus/Pertussis) vaccines immediately and has
sufficient inventories to supply the entire U.S. market during
the remainder of 1999 and the first half of 2000, by which time
other vaccine manufacturers would have their Thimerosal-free
DTP vaccines on line. Thimerosal-laden DTP vaccines containing
25 micrograms of mercury apiece (75 thousand trillion atoms of
mercury) were then being administered to American infants at
two months, four months and six months -- far exceeding EPA's
recommended safe level for mercury. Had CDC accepted SmithKline's
offer, it could have immediately reduced the mercury exposures
to vaccinated six-month-old children by 40%. (Find full article
at this address:)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20060301/cm_huffpost/016550;_ylt=A86.I24NQgVELUUA8Av9wxIF;_ylu=X3oDM
TBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--
Kennedy continued, “However,
in November, CDC mysteriously sent a letter back rejecting SmithKline's
offer. Then, on July 14, 2000 CDC
published a deceptive press release promising to require that all
vaccines be Thimerosal-free as soon as "adequate supplies are
available." This was a full 12 months after the agency had denied
SmithKline's proposal.”
The CDC has allowed an entire generation of children
to be injured.
"If CDC were basing
its decision on safety alone, it would have taken SmithKline up
on its offer. That's a no-brainer," said a federal health official
to Kennedy anonymously. "So there were other considerations beside
safety that were guiding their decision making." “Among these "other
considerations" were CDC's important concerns for the preservation
of the vaccine program, a bureaucratic impulse for self-preservation,
and protecting the economic interests of its vaccine industry friends."Immediate
withdrawal would send a strong message; 'We messed up!'" the health
official told Kennedy. "And I don't think they wanted to send that
message to parents, the public or those considering legal action." "There
was also concern," says the federal official, "that an immediate
withdrawal might discredit the international vaccine programs for
which CDC is an important partner."
Will
the CDC get away with this crime? Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. today
joined Advocates for Children Health Affected by Mercury Poisoning
(A-CHAMP), in demanding Senate investigations of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) actions in obstruction of
rapid removal of mercury from childrens vaccines.
One
can only experience a deep indignation knowing that CDC officials
knowingly exposed millions of kids to neurological poisons AFTER
it was announced in 1999 that children were being exposed to
ILLEGAL and very dangerous amounts of mercury via the childhood
immunization program. For anyone to extend this disasterous mistake
a day longer than necessary is both a tragedy and a serious crime.
With health officials like
these, who needs terrorists?
Mother
of an autistic child
The
CDC childhood immunization department should be hauled before
a Nuremberg type
investigation and YES have the entire world's childhood immunization
program dragged through the mud. What is the difference between
a Nazi doctor injecting toxic substances in humans at the concentration
camps and the CDC deciding it was ok to leave in mecury in the
vaccines when it did not have to? And now the CDC’s decision
to reintroduce mercury bearing thimerosal flu vaccines in 2004
to six month old babies takes on new meaning. It is devastating
to the medical profession to have to admit that we are trusting
the wrong people with the care of our children.
The
evidence of harm is conclusive; these documents are evidence
of crimes against humanity, crimes against the children, crimes
that will be remembered for many years. Officals at the CDC at
a minimum have displayed a lack of knowledge, skill, and judgment.
They have shown inconceivable disregard for the welfare of the
public and have demonstrated that they are unfit to continue
their medical responsibilities to the nation and the world. They
are guilty of professional misconduct and have disgraced, dishonoured
and corrupted the medical and scientific communities.
I
would really love to see Dr. Marie McCormack and Dr.
Julie
Louise Gerberding from the CDC in orange jumpsuits.
Mother
of an autistic child
Kennedy
also reported that “The World Health Organization has urged CDC
against the banning of Thimerosal in U.S. vaccines
since that prohibition might discredit WHO's third world inoculation
programs. WHO, with U.S. funding,
is now injecting children in developing countries with the same amounts
of Thimerosal we were giving American kids at their highest exposures,
but in a shorter time period.” Here in Brazil,
where I am writing from, the information blackout is complete about
these subjects. Not even the doctors here have knowledge about
the mercury in the vaccines and the grave danger they are putting kids
in.
We
now know who the real terrorists are in the world but will we
spend billions and start wars to eradicate them from existence?
Thimerosals presence in childhood vaccines represents a true
weapon of mass destruction. How is it that President Bush had
no intelligence on this weapon already trained on the younglings
of his own nation? Could it be his familes deep intimacy and
history with the Eli Lilly Company has clouded his vision? Eli
Lilly is the company that developed Thimerosal in 1929 and lied
about its safety ever since.
The list of scandals
is a long one and nothing fundamental seems to be changing. Eli
Lilly also introduced genetically modified insulin for diabetes
use after only 3 months of clinical trials without long term safety
profiles. FDA colluded in the approval, and many were harmed.
Add the Baycol story to the list, the antidepressants, statins,
vaccines, and the list of wrongs goes on and on. More recently,
Vioxx has proven to be deadly yet the pharmaceutical company covered
up allowing people to continue to take it and die.
Yet we sit quietly by, or
remain mired in the "correct" manner of complaining. And they get
away with murder over and over again. Without consequence,
without liability they get away with it. And we find each of the
regulatory agencies protecting each other instead of the public.
The CDC, FDA, medical professionals, even Congress is involved
with allowing medicine to turn away from its basic principle of
doing no harm.
And why do we the public allow this
to happen, allow this to continue, despite the evidence that is
given to us by the media and whistleblowers who sometimes tell
the sordid truth? Congressional investigations are called
for, but where will it all go? Is there something inside
us, buried deep that prevents us from taking action? Some long
buried conditioning that we can't go against? Some fear of
retribution from the powers that seem to hold such an ax over our
heads and our bodies if we dissent too loudly?
International Medical Veritas
Association
Copyright 2006 All rights reserved
DID YOU KNOW???
To remove any residue from your flower vase, put two
tablespoons of salt, some raw rice, and one cup of white vinegar. Then
shake vigorously.
DID YOU KNOW???
To save some money on special dust attracting dust cloths,
dip a piece of cheesecloth in a mixture of two cups of water and a
quarter cup of lemon oil. Then let it air dry, this will work just
as well!!
The
United States Congress and
the FDA
Part Two - The Right to
Know What's in Your Food
International Medical Veritas Association
This
is the month in which to view and judge whether the United States
House of Representatives is a democratic institution or whether
it has slipped down the grassy slope into being an institution
that promotes fascism and aggression against its own people.
Remembering the best definition of fascism is the union of corporations
and state, next weeks vote on food labeling laws will, in all
probability, highlight the unholy alliance between major food
corporations and elected representatives of the United States
government. When we remember the founding fathers words and intentions
that this august body is supposed to be of the people, by the
people and for the people the day they vote on this might be
a day for tears.
The New York Times reported
recently that “After a murky legislative process distinguished
by a lack of any public hearing, the House is ready to rush to
approve a special-interest measure for the food industry. The bill
would pre-empt all state food safety regulations that are more
protective than federal standards. A bipartisan majority
behind this clearly dangerous bill is echoing the industry's
line that the goal is simply to end consumers' confusion about
varying state regulations that govern warning labels and protective
inspections.”[i]
Hundreds
of warnings on food labels would vanish across America.
States would not be able to warn, for example, when high levels
of lead or mercury are present in products. "This would be the
most sweeping change in decades to our nation's efforts to protect
the food supply," said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif. "This is a disaster
waiting to happen." 37 state attorney generals joined Waxman this
week asking lawmakers to oppose the bill. Giant food interests
obviously feel threatened by California,
which is leading the way in demanding consumer warnings about mercury
levels in fish, lead in calcium supplements and other hazards.
In reality it’s
part of a broad based attack on the quality of the nations food
supply. Last week, Senate and House Republicans on the Agriculture
appropriations subcommittee inserted a last-minute provision into
the department's fiscal 2006 budget specifying that certain artificial
ingredients could be used in organic food. Ronnie Cummins, national
director of the Organic Consumers Association, calls the initiative
a "sneak attack engineered by the likes of Kraft, Dean Foods
and Smucker's.” When we remember the recent research that
showed that when children who switched their diets for only a few
days to organic foods dramatically and immediately lowered the
amount of toxic pesticides in their bodies we should begin to understand
what is at stake here. Organic foods offer a ray of hope in the
age when both government and industry think it’s their right
to poison our foods with toxic chemicals that they say are safe
but are not.
For
over a hundred years the FDA has been supervising the addition
of disease causing agents into the food supply. It actually started
before the formation of the FDA (with The Division of Chemistry)
when food preservatives first started to be used. Medical studies
were done, subjects got sick and the federal government sided
with industrial interests who needed preservatives to expand
their growing food empires.
A
few days ago Dr. Betty Martini, in an essay called New Cancer Study Obligates FDA
To Recall Aspartame, quotes the late FDA Toxicologist, Dr.
Adrian Gross, who testified to the Senate: "In view of all these
indications that the cancer-causing potential of aspartame is a
matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt,
one can ask: What is the reason for the apparent refusal by the
FDA to invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment
to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act?” The Delaney Amendment
states clearly, if a product causes cancer in animals it cannot
be put in food.
“Is it not clear beyond
any shadow of a doubt that aspartame has caused brain tumors or
brain cancer in animals?” asked Dr. Gross. “Given that
this is so (and I cannot see any kind of tenable argument opposing
the view that aspartame causes cancer) how would the FDA justify
its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame (50mgm/kgm
body weight) as constituting an ADI (Allowable Daily Intake) or "safe" level
of it? Is that position not equivalent to setting a "tolerance" for
this food additive and thus a violation of that law? And
if the FDA itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect
the health of the public?"
Between
Congress and the FDA the public should be well protected but
we find the opposite to be true. These organizations are guilty
of the most horrendous crime of poisoning the food chain and
now congressmen and women are falling all over themselves to
raze state and local laws in favor of national food and retail
interests.
The FDA will resist to the
bitter end, not admitting it has acted as a fascist organization
promoting the large scale poisoning of the human race with aspartame
and other dangerous chemicals like MSG and flouride. It is not
just American citizens who are put at risk but the world’s
population who are consuming thousand of tons of aspartame a year.
Even the kids are dosed with this poison for we find it in everything
from candy to children’s vitamin C.
When the government fears
the people, you have liberty.
When the people fear the government, you have tyranny.
Thomas
Jefferson
Compared
to these organizations and many of the people who control them
Osama bin Laden is a saint. Osama, no matter how much he huffs
and puffs and tries to blow the west down will never be able
to compete with the sheer volume of people hurt and killed by
these public organizations. Now who is it we should really be
hunting down? Who is the real menace to humanity?
As
long as we let the American government get away with its hugely
successful propaganda machine that has perfected the art of misdirecting
the public we will be living in a dark world. Obviously they
will not get away with it forever but millions can and will be
hurt until they collapse under the full weight of their bloated
sense of power. Bin Laden is the enemy of the west but these
American organizations are the enemies of the entire world and
are joined in partnership by the World Health Organization, which
is even worse.
Doesn’t
anyone in America remember
what its like to be an American? Doesn’t anyone remember
the most famous words laid down when America was
founded? Give me liberty or give me death takes on new
meaning today for as we allow our health freedoms to be eroded
we will find ourselves and our loved ones becoming increasingly
sick and dying. Perhaps a miracle will happen and the American
Congress will come to its senses and remember the people and curse
the corporations that have made them sell their souls for the pleasure
of the next junket.
International Medical Veritas
Association
Copyright 2006 All rights reserved.
ADHD-
- NOT JUST FOR KIDS
MEN, WOMEN WITH ADHD AND RELATIONSHIPS ARE AFFECTED
I think
most people are aware of the devastation to a child's life and education
that ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder) can cause.
Its
described very well at the site of the new remedies I have been using:
Imagine living in a fast-moving kaleidoscope,
where sounds, images, and thoughts are constantly shifting. Feeling
easily bored, yet helpless to keep your mind on tasks you need to complete.
Distracted by unimportant sights and sounds,
your mind drives you from one thought or activity to the next. Perhaps
you are so wrapped up in a collage of thoughts and
images that you don't notice when someone speaks to you.
For many people, this is what it's like to have Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, or ADHD.
They may be unable to sit still, plan ahead, finish tasks, or be
fully aware of what's going on around them
But what many people
don't realize is that adults suffer with this as well. Men and women
with ADHD and relationships have a heck of a time making things work.
Their jobs are often precarious due to the difficulty they have with
focus and concentration.
They often feel listless and can lack motivation and
energy because of their constant struggle to concentrate and focus on
their work. Sometimes they can even develop depression, because of
their inability to achieve and negative feedback from those around
them.
Children and adults with ADD are often unfairly
called 'stupid', 'dumb', 'lazy' and other hurtful names,
when all they need is some help and understanding.
Here
are a series of remedies I have been using..with incredible results.
You will be AMAZED!
For
Children:
For Adults:
These are all safe,
effective help for a problem which seems to be growing in leaps and
bounds each year. Personally, I put this down to poor food quality,
toxins in the environment, mercury in vaccinations, food and dental
amalgams.
We are fighting
all the time for our health on this planet...and we know that long
term ingestion of toxic drugs is NOT the answer.
I talk at length
about how our detox pathways work...or not...on my Mercury Detox
page.
DID YOU KNOW???
Lemon Pledge furniture polish contains more lemon
than Country Time Lemonade Mix.
DID YOU KNOW???
To ward off fleas from your dog's sleeping area,
put a little bit of lavender oil on it. Fleas hate lavender oil,
hopefully Fido won't!
Quackbusters" Crushed in
Massachusetts Dental Case...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim
Bolen
Thursday, February 23rd, 2006
The "quackbuster" operation
in North America, run out of a New York ad agency, took
another broadside last month in Massachusetts when
the Massachusetts Dental Board called, not one, but
two, "special meetings," both to dismiss,
with prejudice, all seven charges against cutting-edge
Dentist David Satloff. The attempt to use a
State agency in a "fake" prosecution to
eliminate "Holistic Dentistry," and/or "Biological
Dentistry" failed.
Charges
had been brought against Satloff by the National
Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) president
Robert S. Baratz who claims to be a combination
MD, DDS and PhD. Baratz was, also, the only person
to testify against Satloff - and he testified for
nine full days. I estimate Baratz was paid
$125,000 for his testimony by the State of Massachusetts. Baratz
testified in an earlier hearing that he has never,
actually practiced Dentistry. He also claimed
to be a "spokesperson" for the American
Dental Association, and a consultant to the US FDA.
During
Baratz's testimony, interestingly, Baratz testified
for six-and-one-half hours on his reasons why David
Satloff improperly installed a dental bridge in
a patient's mouth - in great detail. On
cross-examination it was revealed that Baratz, who
graduated from Dental school in1974, had never actually
installed a dental bridge himself, and had never
even seen one installed. When asked how
he could testify as an "expert" on this
subject he replied "I researched it."
It
was also revealed that Baratz had, since 1974,
only worked in a Dental office for one two-and-a-half
week period, shortly after graduation - and never
since then. When asked how he could qualify
as an "expert" to testify in dental cases,
he replied that "testifying WAS his practice
of Dentistry."
So, how did this happen?
Good question.
Strategists
and legal experts working for David Satloff were
amazed, and appalled, that Massachusetts would
hire someone of Baratz's low reputation. It
is common knowledge, with full information available
on the internet alone, that Baratz was formally discredited
in the State of Wisconsin several years ago. There,
lawyers, for a popular cutting-edge MD, demanded,
and got, a three-day "credibility hearing" on
Baratz - where he, Baratz, was confronted with the
reality of his REAL curriculum vitae. You can
read about that earlier situation by clicking here.
Massachusetts
is a weird place, when it comes to health care,
I guess. What was EVEN MORE unusual
than having a "fake" witness both file the
charges AND testify as the expert witness, was that
the State would not tell Satloff, prior to the actual
hearing, exactly what he was charged with. Satloff
had to hire lawyers and sit through five full days
of listening to Baratz testify before he had any
inkling of what it was he was supposed to have done
wrong - and that from the mouth of a man who practiced
dentistry for a total of two-and-a-half weeks in
his entire career.
So,
let me ask you. Would you be surprised
to find out that David Satloff sued some people from
the State; like the prosecutor, the Administrative
Law Judge, the entire Dental Board both as a board,
and individually, and a few others, for this debacle?
Surprised? I'll bet you're not. Everybody
has heard the term "due process." Well,
everybody except the State of Massachusetts, I
guess. Certainly the US Supreme Court has,
and their comments on the subject are rather pointed.
Some
of you will remember when I did an article about
this case - without mentioning David Satloff's
name. I was brought in to help Satloff's very
good Administrative Law attorney, Claudia Hunter,
cross-examine Baratz on day number six. When
I entered the room, Baratz
nearly had a heart attack, and tried to dive
over the table and hide behind the State's prosecutor.
Baratz knew that when I entered the room that the
Satloff case was about to come apart in his face
- for I circulate boxes full of "Baratz data" all
over the country. He, and the prosecutor,
were desperate to get me out of the room. They even
claimed "I had a gun." Baratz, who we've
taped crying buckets of tears during a different
hearing, semi-whimpered through most of the day,
complaining to the judge every time I whispered to,
or handed a note to, attorney Claudia Hunter. It
was fun to watch.
Frankly,
the whole administrative hearing was a setup -
a means to gather evidence of the falseness of
the attack against Satloff. Claudia Hunter
played her role to perfection, going through the
absolutely right motions of an Administrative hearing. Except
for my appearance on day six of Baratz's testimony,
there was no clue about what was being set up, or
about. to happen. Then, two days before the
close of the hearing, the trap was sprung, the lawsuit
was filed, and the REAL trial was about to begin
- but this time the defendant wasn't David Satloff. It
was his persecutors.
Jacques
Simon, an attorney friend of mine out of Manhattan,
New York City came in with his legal assault honed
like King Arthur's razor sharp Excalibur chopping
through the enemy ranks, with blood flying in all
directions. The Massachusetts Dental Board,
their prosecutor, the Administrative Law Judge, and
an additional odd assortment of nitwits, didn't know
what hit them. Prior to Jacques's assault I
think the Massachusetts Dental Board thought "due
process" was spelled "dew process" and
had something to do with processing maple syrup,
early mornings, out in western Massachusetts.
Believe me, Jacques explained the concept of "due
process" to them - in spades - or should I
say "in court documents.," eighty four
pages, to be exact, in the original complaint.
At
first Jacques simply went to a real Judge, in a
real court, and asked for an injunction prohibiting
the Dental board from continuing with the administrative
process against Satloff. Jacques was shocked
when the Judge denied his Motion for Injunction,
at first, but began to smile when the Judge continued
talking. He said something to the effect of "Mr.
Simon, I know you'd like to have an Injunction today,
but I'm not going to give you one. I've never,
in my career seen a case so full of lack of due process,
frankly, and I want to see what these people are
going to do next... I am, however, taking jurisdiction
of this case."
The
State filed a Motion to Dismiss Jacques's Motion
- and lost. Then Jacques sent out "discovery" demands
to everyone that had been named as a defendant -
and more, and the Dental Board figured out they were
in big trouble. And, in big trouble they
were. "Due process" violations can
be used to breach the immunity of Board members and
public employees - and allow a Plaintiff to go after
their personal assets.
What are "Due
Process" violations?
The
Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution prohibits
the deprivation of liberty or property without
due process of law. The guarantee of
due process requires that no person be deprived of
life, liberty, or property without a fair and adequate
process. ...
Due process is best defined in one word--fairness.
Throughout the U.S.'s history, its constitutions,
statutes and case law have provided standards for
fair treatment of citizens by federal, state and
local governments. These standards are known as due
process. When a person is treated unfairly by the
government, including the courts, he is said to have
been deprived of or denied due process.
What's interesting, and scares the crap out of government
officials who routinely deny "due process," is
that getting caught at it could mean that their "immunity
to personal liability" goes out the window. In
other words - they can lose their homes, their cars,
their boats...
Here's how it went...
In short, certain members of the Board of Registration
in Dentistry (BORID) in Massachusetts, acting in
concert with a "special interest group," the
infamous "quackbuster" operation,
decided to eliminate "Holistic Dentistry," or "Biological
Dentistry," in the State of Massachusetts using
the ruse of a prosecution against David Satloff. They
failed, because it was brought to the attention of
the Courts that the whole BORID operation smelled
of cronyism, and abuse of power. The Court
acted appropriately, forcing the issue.
Not only did they fail, but the Board members, in
a complete "tail-tucked-between-the-legs panic" called
two separate "special meetings" to try and
get Jacques Simon off their backs. In those
meetings they formally dismissed all seven charges "with
prejudice," meaning that they can't come back
again.
Frankly, this is a "Model" defense that
can be used in every State every time any State agency
uses any of the "quackbuster" human
slime to come after cutting edge practitioners
I. 1. THE
ALLEGATIONS IN THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ARE DEVOID
OF ANY LEGAL BASIS AND ARE INSUFFICIENT TO
SUPPORT ANY ACTION TAKEN BY THE BOARD AGAINST PLAINTIFF’S
LICENSE.
(A)
BORID’s legally and factually
unsubstantiated accusations regarding Plaintiff’s
conduct which allegedly violates some unspecified
and undefined “standard of care” violate
Plaintiff’s due process
(B) BORID acted outside the scope of its
authority and it violated Plaintiff’s due
process rights by failing to give advance notice
to the plaintiff pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A s. 11A1/2
of the executive meeting in which they considered
the complaints filed against him and in which they
further decided to proceed with disciplinary proceedings
against the plaintiff.
(C) The allegations contained in ¶72-78
of the Order to Show Cause do not and cannot legally
form the basis for any action against the
Plaintiff by BORID.
(D) BORID violated and continues to violate
Plaintiff’s due process rights and it acted
outside the scope of its authority by allowing
the prosecutor to proceed with the prosecution
of the charges alleged in paragraphs 21-31 of the
Order to Show Cause.
(E) BORID exceeded its powers and authority
and it violated Plaintiff’s due process
rights to a fair hearing as mandated by M.G.L.
30A §10 and 11, by 801 CMR 1.01
and by 801 CMR 1.03(5).
(F) BORID’s prosecution of the Plaintiff
amounts to a bad faith act taken in excess of BORID’s
powers in violation of Plaintiff’s due
process rights and in furtherance of the agenda
of private interest groups.
(G) It
is futile to ask the Board to consider the constitutional
arguments made herein.
(H) BORID further violated Plaintiff’s
due process rights by failing to give him notice
that DRT and ART diagnostic procedures are prohibited
by BORID.
(I) The procedure whereby BORID first votes
to seek Plaintiff’s license revocation and
then at the end it votes in accordance with 801CMR(11)(d)
to either accept or reject the Presiding Officer’s
findings is unconstitutional and deprives the plaintiff
of due process of law.
Tim Bolen - Health Freedom Advocate
DID YOU KNOW???
Stale milk will clean your plant leaves. The protein "casein" has
a cleansing effect on plant cell walls.
REASONS
WHY BIRD FLU IS NOT LIKELY TO BECOME EPIDEMIC
Lack of inter-human H5N1 bird flu virus infection explained
Issue date: Mar 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
Flu viruses which target man tend to attach to cells
high up the airway - maximising their chances of being
passed on by coughing or sneezing. Researchers found
the bird flu virus attaches itself to cells deep down
in the human airways. A Wisconsin team of scientists
investigated why the virus could not spread easily between
humans despite the fact that it could replicate efficiently
in human lungs. Flu viruses infecting humans and birds
are known to home in on slightly different versions of
the same molecule, found on the surface of cells that
line the respiratory tract.
The latest study found the version of the molecule targeted
by human viruses was more prevalent on cells higher up
in the airway. The molecule targeted by bird viruses,
on the other hand, tended to be found on cells deep within
the lungs, in the alveoli. Thus the bird flu virus tended
to be buried so deep in the lungs that it was unlikely
to be spread by coughing or sneezing.
The
trick with any flu is to not allow it to replicate.
My page on traditional
remedies..herbal.. bird flu...or any flu has
the info you need. |
|
Full
Report ..No
need for Bird Flu Survival Lists....another question
I get often....
Enjoy!
Till
the next time..
Dr.
Deb
|
INFORMATION AND
SOLUTIONS FOR:
 MERCURY:
OSTEOPOROSIS
SPORTS
NUTRITION /FITNESS AND
WEIGHT LOSS
FLU
PREVENTION
HOMEOPATHY
HOLISTIC
PET CARE
PAST
NEWSLETTERS
|
