Some dermatologists and clinicians have a differing point of
view. One such
practice conducted an abstract study wherein they used a “double-blinded
randomized trial.” This
means that neither the clinicians conducting the test nor the
subjects, knew which of a particular topical agent they were
testing.
Twenty women with a moderate degree of cellulite on the buttocks
and/or thighs were entered into a four-week, double-blinded,
randomized trial where an anti-cellulite cream was applied to
the affected sites on a nightly basis.
Some of them were randomly selected to use a neoprene garment
on either leg. High
quality digital photography was used to photograph them from
different angles before and after four weeks of treatment.
17 of the subjects actually completed the study. Of those 17, 76% saw overall improvement
in their cellulite. 54% reported even greater
improvement on the thigh that used the special garment.
The dermatological evaluators found an improvement in 65% of
treated legs with the garment and 59% of treated legs without
the garment.
Further, the evaluators found the thighs using the garment showed
greater improvement than those that did not in 65% of subjects.
The topical agent used in this study was found to be effective
in reducing the appearance of cellulite and the neoprene garment
enhanced the effect of this topical agent in cellulite reduction.
The dermatological evaluators claim that the success of this
study validates the garment used to enhance the topical agent
used.
In the abstract on the study..they do not mention the topical
agent used. For those who wish to follow up..here is the journal
it appeared in:
J Drugs Dermatol. 2004
Jul-Aug;3(4):417-25
Titled: A double-blinded randomized trial testing the tolerability
and efficacy of a novel topical agent with and without occlusion
for the treatment of cellulite: a study and review of the literature.